Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012
2012
View full specs →

Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 measures 22,8 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 at 18,9 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 tips the scales at 3 875 lbs — 3 588 lbs less than the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 at 287 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 tops out at 300 hp. Engine specs for the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 carries 39 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 18,9 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
ModelCaptiva 186 BR
ModelCaptiva 220 MTXC
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam89 in. (2.26 m)
Beam8 ft. 2 in
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches89
Beam - Inches98
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in. (0.406 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [drive up] inches22
Weight - Detail2,450 lbs. (1,112 kg) dry 2,870 lbs. (1,303 kg) wet
Weight - Detail3,875 lbs. dry 4,135 lbs. wet
Weight - kg1301.81
Weight - kg1757.67
Weight - lbs.287
Weight - lbs.3875
Length - Feet18.92
Length - Feet22.75
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 11 in. (5.77 m)
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters5.77
Length overall - Meters6.93
Length overall - Inches227
Length overall - Inches273
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal. (99 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail39 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters98.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters147.63
Fuel tank capacity - Gal26
Fuel tank capacity - Gal39
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeInboard
Drive typeInboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people8 (7)
Maximum people1
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity2

Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 vs Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012?
The Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 is the longer of the two at 22,8 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 comes in at 18,9 feet, making it roughly 3,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012?
For trailering, the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 has the edge at 287 lbs dry weight versus 3 875 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 has a documented max rating of 300 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 measures 98" wide, compared to 89" for the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012?
The Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 has the bigger tank at 39 gallons, versus 26 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 and Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker Captiva 186 BR 2013 and the Rinker Captiva 220 MTXC 2012 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.