Rinker 400 EC 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 400 EC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker 400 EC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Rinker 400 EC 2010 against a deep vee Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker 400 EC 2010 measures 41,5 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 12,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 at 29,2 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 tips the scales at 5 765 lbs — 3 797 lbs less than the Rinker 400 EC 2010 at 1 968 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 400 EC 2010 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 400 EC 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 400 EC 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 41,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model400 EC
ModelCaptiva 276 BR
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam13 ft. 0 in. (3.96 m)
Beam109 in. (2.77 m)
Beam - Meters3.96
Beam - Meters2.77
Beam - Inches156
Beam - Inches109
Bridge clearance - Detail13 ft. 3 in. (4.04 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters4.04
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches159
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise18℃
Deadrisenot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (56 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail38 in. (96 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.97
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches38
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail19,680 lbs. (8,927 kg)
Weight - Detail5,765 lbs. (2,617 kg) dry 6,475 lbs. (2,940 kg) wet
Weight - kg8926.69
Weight - kg2614.96
Weight - lbs.1968
Weight - lbs.5765
Length - Feet41.5
Length - Feet29.17
Length overall - Detail41 ft. 6 in. (12.64 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.9 m)
Length overall - Meters12.65
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches498
Length overall - Inches35
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardTWIN Volvo 8.1 Gi DP - 375 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail300 gal. (1,136 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal. (258 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1135.62
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
HeadroomCabin: 6 ft. 10 in. (2.08 m)
Headroomnot available
Sleeping capacity6
Sleeping capacitynot available
Water capacityFresh: 69 gal. (235 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certifed
Holding tank capacity - DetailWaste: 45 gal. (170.3 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters170.34
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal45
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available

Rinker 400 EC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 400 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
The Rinker 400 EC 2010 is the longer of the two at 41,5 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 comes in at 29,2 feet, making it roughly 12,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 400 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker 400 EC 2010 has the edge at 1 968 lbs dry weight versus 5 765 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 400 EC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 400 EC 2010 measures 156" wide, compared to 109" for the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 400 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 has the bigger tank at 68 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Rinker 400 EC 2010. That 65-gallon difference translates to roughly 195–325 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 400 EC 2010 and Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 400 EC 2010 and the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.