Rinker 360 EC 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 360 EC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker 360 EC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Rinker 360 EC 2010 against a deep vee Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker 360 EC 2010 measures 37,9 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 15,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 at 22,6 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 tips the scales at 4 135 lbs — 2 580 lbs less than the Rinker 360 EC 2010 at 1 555 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 360 EC 2010 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 caps at 10. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 360 EC 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 360 EC 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 37,9 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 10 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model360 EC
ModelCaptiva 220 MTX
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam12 ft. 0 in. (3.66 m)
Beam98 in. (2.49 m)
Beam - Meters3.66
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches144
Beam - Inches98
Bridge clearance - Detail12 ft. 8 in. (3.86 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters3.86
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches152
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise18℃
Deadrisenot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail15,550 lbs. (7,068 kg)
Weight - Detail3,520 lbs. (1,598 kg) dry 4,135 lbs. (1,877 kg) wet
Weight - kg7053.36
Weight - kg1875.6
Weight - lbs.1555
Weight - lbs.4135
Length - Feet37.92
Length - Feet22.58
Length overall - Detail37 ft. 11 in. (11.56 m)
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 7 in. (6.88 m)
Length overall - Meters11.56
Length overall - Meters6.88
Length overall - Inches455
Length overall - Inches271
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardTWIN Volvo 5.7 Gi DP - 300 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail235 gal. (889.6 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal. (129 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters889.57
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal235
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
HeadroomCabin: 6 ft. 11 in. (2.11 m)
Headroomnot available
Sleeping capacity6
Sleeping capacitynot available
Water capacityFresh: 51 gal. (193.1 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum people10 (8)
Holding tank capacity - DetailWaste: 45 gal. (170.3 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters170.34
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal45
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available

Rinker 360 EC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 360 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013?
The Rinker 360 EC 2010 is the longer of the two at 37,9 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 comes in at 22,6 feet, making it roughly 15,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 360 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker 360 EC 2010 has the edge at 1 555 lbs dry weight versus 4 135 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 360 EC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 360 EC 2010 measures 144" wide, compared to 98" for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 360 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013?
The Rinker 360 EC 2010 has the bigger tank at 235 gallons, versus 34 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013. That 201-gallon difference translates to roughly 603–1005 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 360 EC 2010 and Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 360 EC 2010 and the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.