Rinker 310 EC 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 310 EC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker 310 EC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Rinker 310 EC 2010 against a deep vee Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker 310 EC 2010 measures 33,3 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 10,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 at 22,6 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 tips the scales at 4 135 lbs — 4 014 lbs less than the Rinker 310 EC 2010 at 121 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats are rated for 10 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Rinker 310 EC 2010 at 33,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 at 22,6 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model310 EC
ModelCaptiva 220 MTX
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam10 ft. 6 in. (3.2 m)
Beam98 in. (2.49 m)
Beam - Meters3.2
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches126
Beam - Inches98
Bridge clearance - Detail10 ft. 2 in. (3.1 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters3.1
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches122
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise18°
Deadrisenot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (56 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail12,100 lbs. (5,489 kg)
Weight - Detail3,520 lbs. (1,598 kg) dry 4,135 lbs. (1,877 kg) wet
Weight - kg5488.46
Weight - kg1875.6
Weight - lbs.121
Weight - lbs.4135
Length - Feet33.25
Length - Feet22.58
Length overall - Detail33 ft. 3 in. (10.13 m)
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 7 in. (6.88 m)
Length overall - Meters10.13
Length overall - Meters6.88
Length overall - Inches399
Length overall - Inches271
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardTWIN Mercruiser 5.0 L MPI B2 - 260 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail150 gal. (567.8 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal. (129 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters567.81
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal15
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
HeadroomCabin: 6 ft. 5 in. (1.96 m)
Headroomnot available
Sleeping capacity5
Sleeping capacitynot available
Water capacityFresh: 33 gal. (124.9 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum people10 (8)
Holding tank capacity - DetailWaste: 47 gal. (177.9 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters177.91
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal47
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available

Rinker 310 EC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 310 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013?
The Rinker 310 EC 2010 is the longer of the two at 33,3 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 comes in at 22,6 feet, making it roughly 10,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 310 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker 310 EC 2010 has the edge at 121 lbs dry weight versus 4 135 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 310 EC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 310 EC 2010 measures 126" wide, compared to 98" for the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 310 EC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 has the bigger tank at 34 gallons, versus 15 gallons on the Rinker 310 EC 2010. That 19-gallon difference translates to roughly 57–95 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 310 EC 2010 and Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 310 EC 2010 and the Rinker Captiva 220 MTX 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.