Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003
2003
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011
2011
View full specs →

Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 vs Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 vs Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 tops out at 225 hp. Engine specs for the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 carries 39 gallons versus 1 gallons in the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 19,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model282 Captiva Bowrider
ModelCaptiva 200 MTX
Model Year2003
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft
Beam8 ft. 0 in. (2.43 m)
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches108
Beam - Inches96
Deadrise21℃
Deadrise16°
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail6,040 lbs
Weight - Detail2,742 lbs. (1,244 kg)
Weight - kg2739.7
Weight - kg1243.75
Weight - lbs.604
Weight - lbs.2742
Height - DetailBridge Clearance: 5 ft. 8 in
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters1.73
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches68
Height - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail29 ft
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 4 in. (5.89 m)
Length overall - Meters8.84
Length overall - Meters5.89
Length overall - Inches348
Length overall - Inches232
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Length - Feetnot available
Length - Feet19.33
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length [over all with swim platform]21 ft. 1 in. (6.35 m)
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard320 PHP
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gallons
Fuel tank capacity - Detail39 gal. (147 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Liters147.63
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel tank capacity - Gal39
Max no of enginesnot available
Max no of engines1
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercruiser
Engine modelnot available
Engine model3.0 TKS
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeI/O
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower135 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine max225 hp
Operational Info
HeadroomCabin Headroom: 5 ft
Headroomnot available
Water capacityFresh: 10 gallons
Water capacitynot available
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people9
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee

Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 vs Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011?
For trailering, the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 has the edge at 604 lbs dry weight versus 2 742 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 has a documented max rating of 225 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 measures 108" wide, compared to 96" for the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 or the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011?
The Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 has the bigger tank at 39 gallons, versus 1 gallons on the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003. That 38-gallon difference translates to roughly 114–190 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 and Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 282 Captiva Bowrider 2003 and the Rinker Captiva 200 MTX 2011 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.