Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 and the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 at 28,9 ft versus Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 at 26,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 tips the scales at 491 lbs — 436 lbs less than the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 at 55 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 28,9 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model276 Captiva Bowrider
ModelCaptiva 246 CC
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 0 in. (2.74 m)
Beam102 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches108
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 6 in. (1.68 m) With Arch: 8 ft. 1 in. (2.46 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.46
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches97
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise21℃
Deadrisenot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail5,500 lbs. (2,495 kg)
Weight - Detail4,910 lbs. (2,229 kg) dry 5,810 lbs. (2,638 kg) wet
Weight - kg2494.76
Weight - kg2227.14
Weight - lbs.55
Weight - lbs.491
Length - Feet28.92
Length - Feet26.17
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 11 in. (8.81 m)
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in. (7.98 m)
Length overall - Meters8.81
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Inches347
Length overall - Inches314
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.7 Gi DP - 300 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gal. (321.7 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal. (258 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
Water capacityFresh: 10 gal. (37.8 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certifed
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum peopleYacht certifed
Maximum peopleYacht certified

Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013?
The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is the longer of the two at 28,9 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 comes in at 26,2 feet, making it roughly 2,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 has the edge at 55 lbs dry weight versus 491 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 measures 108" wide, compared to 102" for the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013?
The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 has the bigger tank at 75 gallons, versus 68 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013. That 7-gallon difference translates to roughly 21–35 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 and Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 and the Rinker Captiva 246 CC 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.