Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Rinker 310 EC 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 310 EC 2010
2010
View full specs →

Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 vs Rinker 310 EC 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 against a modified vee Rinker 310 EC 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker 310 EC 2010 measures 33,3 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 4,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 at 28,9 feet (2010). At 55 lbs and 121 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 310 EC 2010 is rated for 10 passengers, while the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 310 EC 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 310 EC 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 10 passengers and at 33,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model276 Captiva Bowrider
Model310 EC
Model Year201
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 0 in. (2.74 m)
Beam10 ft. 6 in. (3.2 m)
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Meters3.2
Beam - Inches108
Beam - Inches126
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 6 in. (1.68 m) With Arch: 8 ft. 1 in. (2.46 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail10 ft. 2 in. (3.1 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.46
Bridge clearance - Meters3.1
Bridge clearance - Inches97
Bridge clearance - Inches122
Deadrise21℃
Deadrise18°
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (56 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail5,500 lbs. (2,495 kg)
Weight - Detail12,100 lbs. (5,489 kg)
Weight - kg2494.76
Weight - kg5488.46
Weight - lbs.55
Weight - lbs.121
Length - Feet28.92
Length - Feet33.25
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 11 in. (8.81 m)
Length overall - Detail33 ft. 3 in. (10.13 m)
Length overall - Meters8.81
Length overall - Meters10.13
Length overall - Inches347
Length overall - Inches399
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.7 Gi DP - 300 hp
Engine/s standardTWIN Mercruiser 5.0 L MPI B2 - 260 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gal. (321.7 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail150 gal. (567.8 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Liters567.81
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Fuel tank capacity - Gal15
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Operational Info
Water capacityFresh: 10 gal. (37.8 l)
Water capacityFresh: 33 gal. (124.9 l)
Maximum capacityYacht certifed
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certifed
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Headroomnot available
HeadroomCabin: 6 ft. 5 in. (1.96 m)
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity5
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - DetailWaste: 47 gal. (177.9 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters177.91
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal47

Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 vs Rinker 310 EC 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 or the Rinker 310 EC 2010?
The Rinker 310 EC 2010 is the longer of the two at 33,3 feet overall. The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 comes in at 28,9 feet, making it roughly 4,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 or the Rinker 310 EC 2010?
For trailering, the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 has the edge at 55 lbs dry weight versus 121 lbs for the Rinker 310 EC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker 310 EC 2010 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 310 EC 2010 measures 126" wide, compared to 108" for the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 or the Rinker 310 EC 2010?
The Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 has the bigger tank at 75 gallons, versus 15 gallons on the Rinker 310 EC 2010. That 60-gallon difference translates to roughly 180–300 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 and Rinker 310 EC 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 276 Captiva Bowrider 2010 and the Rinker 310 EC 2010 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.