Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 vs Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 against a deep vee Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 at 28,0 ft versus Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 at 29,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 tips the scales at 5 765 lbs — 5 090 lbs less than the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 at 675 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 and Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model260 Express Cruiser
ModelCaptiva 276 BR
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam109 in. (2.77 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.77
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches109
Bridge clearance - Detail7 ft. 0 in. (2.13 m) With Arch: 9 ft. 6 in. (2.9 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.9
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches114
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise18℃
Deadrisenot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail26 in. (66 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.66
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches26
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail38 in. (97 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.97
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches38
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail6,750 lbs. (3,062 kg)
Weight - Detail5,765 lbs. (2,617 kg) dry 6,475 lbs. (2,940 kg) wet
Weight - kg3061.75
Weight - kg2614.96
Weight - lbs.675
Weight - lbs.5765
Length - Meters8.79
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet28
Length - Feet29.17
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 10 in. (8.79 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.9 m)
Length overall - Meters8.79
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches346
Length overall - Inches35
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercruiser 5.0 MPI B2 - 260 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gal. (283.9 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal. (258 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
HeadYes
Headnot available
Water capacityFresh: 33 gal. (124.9 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certifed
Holding tank capacity - DetailWaste: 27 gal. (102.2 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters102.21
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal27
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available

Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 vs Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 is the longer of the two at 29,2 feet overall. The Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 comes in at 28,0 feet, making it roughly 1,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 has the edge at 675 lbs dry weight versus 5 765 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 measures 109" wide, compared to 102" for the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
The Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 has the bigger tank at 75 gallons, versus 68 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013. That 7-gallon difference translates to roughly 21–35 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 and Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 260 Express Cruiser 2009 and the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.