Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Rinker 246 CC 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 246 CC 2010
2010
View full specs →

Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 vs Rinker 246 CC 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 vs Rinker 246 CC 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 at 26,0 ft versus Rinker 246 CC 2010 at 26,2 ft. At 495 lbs and 505 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 carries a rated maximum of 375 hp. Engine data for the Rinker 246 CC 2010 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 75 gal and 75 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 7 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 and Rinker 246 CC 2010 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model246 Captiva R2
Model246 CC
Model Year2007
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise20℃
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail4,950 lbs. (2,245 kg)
Weight - Detail5,050 lbs. (2,291 kg)
Weight - kg2245.28
Weight - kg2290.64
Weight - lbs.495
Weight - lbs.505
Length - Meters5.84
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet26
Length - Feet26.17
Length - Inches2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m)
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in. (7.97 m)
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Inches314
Length overall - Inches314
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [drive up] inches22
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercruiser 5.0L MPI Alpha - 260 hp
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.0 GXi SX - 270 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gal. (283.9 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeInboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine max375 hp
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Headroom4 ft. 0 in
Headroomnot available
Water capacity10 gal
Water capacityFresh: 10 gal. (37.8 l)
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity2
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum peopleYacht certified

Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 vs Rinker 246 CC 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 or the Rinker 246 CC 2010?
The Rinker 246 CC 2010 is the longer of the two at 26,2 feet overall. The Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 or the Rinker 246 CC 2010?
For trailering, the Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 has the edge at 495 lbs dry weight versus 505 lbs for the Rinker 246 CC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 has a documented max rating of 375 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker 246 CC 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Rinker 246 CC 2010 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 and Rinker 246 CC 2010 share an 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 and Rinker 246 CC 2010?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 75 gallons and 75 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 and Rinker 246 CC 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 246 Captiva R2 2007 and the Rinker 246 CC 2010 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.