Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Rinker 400 EC 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 400 EC 2010
2010
View full specs →

Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 vs Rinker 400 EC 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 vs Rinker 400 EC 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker 400 EC 2010 measures 41,5 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 15,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 at 26,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker 400 EC 2010 tips the scales at 1 968 lbs — 1 463 lbs less than the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 at 505 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 400 EC 2010 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 400 EC 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 400 EC 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 41,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model246 Captiva Cuddy
Model400 EC
Model Year2006
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam13 ft. 0 in. (3.96 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters3.96
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches156
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail13 ft. 3 in. (4.04 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Meters4.04
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Bridge clearance - Inches159
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise18℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (56 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail38 in. (96 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.97
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches38
Weight - Detail5,050 lbs. (2,291 kg)
Weight - Detail19,680 lbs. (8,927 kg)
Weight - kg2290.64
Weight - kg8926.69
Weight - lbs.505
Weight - lbs.1968
Length - Feet26
Length - Feet41.5
Length - Inches2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in. (7.97 m)
Length overall - Detail41 ft. 6 in. (12.64 m)
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Meters12.65
Length overall - Inches314
Length overall - Inches498
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail300 gal. (1,136 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1135.62
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardTWIN Volvo 8.1 Gi DP - 375 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typenot available
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Operational Info
Headroomnot available
HeadroomCabin: 6 ft. 10 in. (2.08 m)
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity6
Water capacitynot available
Water capacityFresh: 69 gal. (235 l)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - DetailWaste: 45 gal. (170.3 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters170.34
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal45

Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 vs Rinker 400 EC 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 or the Rinker 400 EC 2010?
The Rinker 400 EC 2010 is the longer of the two at 41,5 feet overall. The Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 15,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 or the Rinker 400 EC 2010?
For trailering, the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 has the edge at 505 lbs dry weight versus 1 968 lbs for the Rinker 400 EC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Rinker 400 EC 2010 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 400 EC 2010 measures 156" wide, compared to 102" for the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 or the Rinker 400 EC 2010?
The Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 has the bigger tank at 75 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Rinker 400 EC 2010. That 72-gallon difference translates to roughly 216–360 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 and Rinker 400 EC 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 246 Captiva Cuddy 2006 and the Rinker 400 EC 2010 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.