Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003
2003
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 228 2011 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 228 2011
2011
View full specs →

Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 vs Rinker Captiva 228 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 vs Rinker Captiva 228 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Rinker Captiva 228 2011 tops out at 320 hp. Engine specs for the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 carries 75 gallons versus 59 gallons in the Rinker Captiva 228 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 228 2011 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 0,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker Captiva 228 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model232 Captiva Cuddy
ModelCaptiva 228
Model Year2003
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise21℃
Deadrise16℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (56 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail4,215 lbs
Weight - Detail5,031 lbs. (2,282 kg)
Weight - kg1911.89
Weight - kg2282.02
Weight - lbs.4215
Weight - lbs.5031
Height - DetailBridge Clearance: 5 ft
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters1.52
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches6
Height - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 8 in. (6.9 m)
Length overall - Meters7.16
Length overall - Meters6.91
Length overall - Inches282
Length overall - Inches272
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Length - Feetnot available
Length - Feet22.67
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard220 HP
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gallons
Fuel tank capacity - Detail59 gal. (223.3 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Liters223.34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Fuel tank capacity - Gal59
Max no of enginesnot available
Max no of engines1
Engine makenot available
Engine makeVolvo Penta
Engine modelnot available
Engine model5.0 GXi SX
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeI/O
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower270 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine max320 hp
Operational Info
HeadroomCabin Headroom: 5 ft
Headroomnot available
Water capacityFresh: 10 gallons
Water capacityFresh: 10 gal. (37.8 l)
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people1
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 vs Rinker Captiva 228 2011 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 or the Rinker Captiva 228 2011?
For trailering, the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 has the edge at 4 215 lbs dry weight versus 5 031 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 228 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Captiva 228 2011 has a documented max rating of 320 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 228 2011 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 and Rinker Captiva 228 2011 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 or the Rinker Captiva 228 2011?
The Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 has the bigger tank at 75 gallons, versus 59 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 228 2011. That 16-gallon difference translates to roughly 48–80 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 and Rinker Captiva 228 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 232 Captiva Cuddy 2003 and the Rinker Captiva 228 2011 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.