Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006
2006
View full specs →

Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 vs Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 vs Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 measures 28,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 5,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 at 23,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 tips the scales at 535 lbs — 170 lbs less than the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 at 365 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 28,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model226 XL Captiva Bowrider
Model262 Captiva Cuddy
Model Year2009
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 6 in. (1.52 m) w/o Arch
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Meters1.68
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Bridge clearance - Inches66
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise21℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail3,650 lbs. (1,656 kg)
Weight - Detail5,350 lbs. (2,427 kg)
Weight - kg1655.61
Weight - kg2426.72
Weight - lbs.365
Weight - lbs.535
Length - Meters7.16
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet23
Length - Feet28
Length - Inches6
Length - Inches2
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 6 in. (7.16 m)
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 2 in. (8.58 m)
Length overall - Meters7.16
Length overall - Meters8.59
Length overall - Inches282
Length overall - Inches338
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.0 GL SX - 220 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal. (158 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail85 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters321.76
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal85
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeI/O
Drive typenot available
Operational Info
Maximum people1
Maximum peoplenot available

Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 vs Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 or the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006?
The Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 comes in at 23,0 feet, making it roughly 5,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 or the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006?
For trailering, the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 has the edge at 365 lbs dry weight versus 535 lbs for the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 1 passengers, while the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 and Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 share an 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 or the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006?
The Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 has the bigger tank at 85 gallons, versus 42 gallons on the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009. That 43-gallon difference translates to roughly 129–215 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 and Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 226 XL Captiva Bowrider 2009 and the Rinker 262 Captiva Cuddy 2006 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.