Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010
2010
View full specs →

Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 vs Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 vs Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 measures 26,2 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 3,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 at 23,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 tips the scales at 495 lbs — 130 lbs less than the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 at 365 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 23,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model226 Captiva R1
Model246 Captiva Bowrider
Model Year2006
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise20℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail3,650 lbs. (1,655.6 kg)
Weight - Detail4,950 lbs. (2,245 kg)
Weight - kg1655.61
Weight - kg2245.28
Weight - lbs.365
Weight - lbs.495
Length - Feet23
Length - Feet26.17
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 6 in. (7.16 m)
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 2 in. (7.97 m)
Length overall - Meters7.16
Length overall - Meters7.98
Length overall - Inches282
Length overall - Inches314
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail75 gal. (283.9 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters283.91
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal75
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.0 GXi SX - 270 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Operational Info
Maximum people11
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Water capacitynot available
Water capacityFresh: 10 gal. (37.8 l)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee

Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 vs Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 or the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010?
The Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is the longer of the two at 26,2 feet overall. The Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 comes in at 23,0 feet, making it roughly 3,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 or the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010?
For trailering, the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 has the edge at 365 lbs dry weight versus 495 lbs for the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 and Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 share an 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 or the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010?
The Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 has the bigger tank at 75 gallons, versus 42 gallons on the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006. That 33-gallon difference translates to roughly 99–165 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 and Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 226 Captiva R1 2006 and the Rinker 246 Captiva Bowrider 2010 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.