Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012
2012
View full specs →

Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 and the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 at 21,0 ft versus Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 at 21,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 tips the scales at 3 935 lbs — 3 894 lbs less than the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 at 41 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 tops out at 300 hp. Engine specs for the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 39 gal and 42 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 1 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 and Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model210 MTXC CC
ModelCaptiva 216 BR
Model Year201
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 2 in. (2.49 m)
Beam8 ft
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches96
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 2 in. (1.57 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters1.57
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches62
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise16℃
Deadrisenot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (56 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail34 in
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.86
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches34
Draft [max] - Detail37 in. (94 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.94
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches37
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail4,100 lbs. (1,860 kg)
Weight - Detail3,935 lbs. dry 4,195 lbs. wet
Weight - kg1859.73
Weight - kg1784.88
Weight - lbs.41
Weight - lbs.3935
Length - Feet21
Length - Feet21
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 0 in. (6.4 m)
Length overall - Detail21 ft
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Inches252
Length overall - Inches252
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardVolvo 4.3 GL SX - 190 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail39 gal. (147.6 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters147.63
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Gal39
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max300 hp
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity2
Sleeping capacitynot available
Maximum people1
Maximum people1

Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 vs Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012?
The Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 is the longer of the two at 21,0 feet overall. The Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 comes in at 21,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012?
For trailering, the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 has the edge at 41 lbs dry weight versus 3 935 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 has a documented max rating of 300 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 1 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 measures 98" wide, compared to 96" for the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 or the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012?
The Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 has the bigger tank at 42 gallons, versus 39 gallons on the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 and Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 210 MTXC CC 2010 and the Rinker Captiva 216 BR 2012 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.