Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013
2013
View full specs →

Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 vs Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 and the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 measures 29,2 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 8,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 at 21,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 tips the scales at 5 765 lbs — 5 724 lbs less than the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 at 41 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 29,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy
ModelCaptiva 276 BR
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 2 in. (2.49 m)
Beam109 in. (2.77 m)
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.77
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches109
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 2 in. (1.57 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters1.57
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches62
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise16℃
Deadrisenot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (56 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail37 in. (94 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.94
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches37
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail4,100 lbs. (1,860 kg)
Weight - Detail5,765 lbs. (2,617 kg) dry 6,475 lbs. (2,940 kg) wet
Weight - kg1859.73
Weight - kg2614.96
Weight - lbs.41
Weight - lbs.5765
Length - Meters6.4
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet21
Length - Feet29.17
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 0 in. (6.4 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.9 m)
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches252
Length overall - Inches35
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardVolvo 4.3 GL SX - 190 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail39 gal. (147.6 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail68 gal. (258 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters147.63
Fuel tank capacity - Liters257.41
Fuel tank capacity - Gal39
Fuel tank capacity - Gal68
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
HeadYes
Headnot available
Sleeping capacity2
Sleeping capacitynot available
Maximum people1
Maximum peopleYacht certifed

Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 vs Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 is the longer of the two at 29,2 feet overall. The Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 comes in at 21,0 feet, making it roughly 8,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
For trailering, the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 has the edge at 41 lbs dry weight versus 5 765 lbs for the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 1 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 measures 109" wide, compared to 98" for the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 or the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013?
The Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 has the bigger tank at 68 gallons, versus 39 gallons on the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009. That 29-gallon difference translates to roughly 87–145 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 and Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 210 MTXC Captiva Cuddy 2009 and the Rinker Captiva 276 BR 2013 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.