Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Rinker Captiva 186 2011 boat specs
Rinker
Rinker Captiva 186 2011
2011
View full specs →

Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 vs Rinker Captiva 186 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 vs Rinker Captiva 186 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 at 19,0 ft versus Rinker Captiva 186 2011 at 18,8 ft. At 269 lbs and 231 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The Rinker Captiva 186 2011 tops out at 225 hp. Engine specs for the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 carries 42 gallons versus 29 gallons in the Rinker Captiva 186 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 and Rinker Captiva 186 2011 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRinker
MakeRinker
Model192 Captiva Bowrider
ModelCaptiva 186
Model Year2006
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 0 in. (2.43 m)
Beam7 ft. 5 in. (2.26 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches89
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 0 in. (1.52 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Meters1.52
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Bridge clearance - Inches6
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise20°
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail22 in. (55 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail2,690 lbs. (1,220 kg)
Weight - Detail2,310 lbs. (1,048 kg)
Weight - kg1220.16
Weight - kg1047.8
Weight - lbs.269
Weight - lbs.231
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet18.75
Length - Inches2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 9 in. (5.71 m)
Length overall - Meters5.84
Length overall - Meters5.72
Length overall - Inches23
Length overall - Inches225
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail29 gal. (109 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters109.78
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal29
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Max no of enginesnot available
Max no of engines1
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercruiser
Engine modelnot available
Engine model3.0 MPI Catalyst
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower135 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine max225 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people8
Maximum people8
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee

Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 vs Rinker Captiva 186 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 or the Rinker Captiva 186 2011?
The Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Rinker Captiva 186 2011 comes in at 18,8 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 or the Rinker Captiva 186 2011?
For trailering, the Rinker Captiva 186 2011 has the edge at 231 lbs dry weight versus 269 lbs for the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Rinker Captiva 186 2011 has a documented max rating of 225 hp. Engine specifications for the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Rinker Captiva 186 2011 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 measures 96" wide, compared to 89" for the Rinker Captiva 186 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 or the Rinker Captiva 186 2011?
The Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 has the bigger tank at 42 gallons, versus 29 gallons on the Rinker Captiva 186 2011. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 and Rinker Captiva 186 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Rinker 192 Captiva Bowrider 2006 and the Rinker Captiva 186 2011 are built by Rinker. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.