The Regal 52 Sport Coupe 2012 vs Regal Commodore 4060 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Regal 52 Sport Coupe 2012 measures 53,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 49,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Regal Commodore 4060 2007 at 4,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Regal 52 Sport Coupe 2012 tips the scales at 344 lbs — 325 lbs more than the Regal Commodore 4060 2007 at 19 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Regal 52 Sport Coupe 2012 carries a rated maximum of 87 hp. Engine data for the Regal Commodore 4060 2007 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Regal Commodore 4060 2007 carries 277 gallons versus 45 gallons in the Regal 52 Sport Coupe 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Regal 52 Sport Coupe 2012 is rated for 16 passengers, while the Regal Commodore 4060 2007 caps at 12. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Regal 52 Sport Coupe 2012 could be the deciding factor.