Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 boat specs
Regal
Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Regal Commodore 4080 2007 boat specs
Regal
Regal Commodore 4080 2007
2007
View full specs →

Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 vs Regal Commodore 4080 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 vs Regal Commodore 4080 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 measures 46,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 42,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Regal Commodore 4080 2007 at 4,0 feet (2007). At 253 lbs and 193 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Bottom line: The Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 at 46,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Regal Commodore 4080 2007 at 4,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeRegal
MakeRegal
Model46 Sport Coupe
ModelCommodore 408
Model Year2012
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam14 ft. (4.27 m)
Beam13 ft. (3.9 m)
Beam - Meters4.27
Beam - Meters3.96
Beam - Inches168
Beam - Inches156
Deadrise20°
Deadrise18℃
Depth - Detail38 in. (0.97 m) cockpit - helm
Depth - Detail32 in. (0.8 m)
Depth - Centimeters96.52
Depth - Centimeters81.28
Depth - Inches38
Depth - Inches32
Draft [drive up] - Detail42 in. (1.07 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters1.07
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches42
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Weight - Detail25,300 lbs. (11,475 kg) with IPS 5
Weight - Detail19,300 lbs. (8,754 kg)
Weight - kg11475.88
Weight - kg8754.33
Weight - lbs.253
Weight - lbs.193
Height - Detail12 ft. 10 in. (3.91 m) waterline, top of hard top with radar 14 ft. 7 in. (4.4 m) shipping height, top of hard top
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters4.45
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches175
Height - Inchesnot available
Length - Feet46
Length - Feet4
Length [over all with swim platform]46 ft. (14.02 m) with ext. platform
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - DetailTop Down: 15 ft. 3 in. (4.6 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters4.65
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches183
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail39 in. (0.99 m)
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches39
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters12.2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail40 ft. 1 in. (12.2 m)
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters12.22
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches481
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail328 gal. (1,242 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail252 gal. (953 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1241.61
Fuel tank capacity - Liters953.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal328
Fuel tank capacity - Gal252
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeInboard - Twin
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard840 Twin Volvo 8.1 GXi V FWC
Operational Info
StorageCockpit: 100 cu. ft. (2.8 m³)
Storagenot available
Water capacity101 gal. (382 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum peopleYacht
Maximum peoplenot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail48 gal. (182 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters181.7
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal48
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Headnot available
HeadVacuFlush? w/ holding tank

Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 vs Regal Commodore 4080 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 or the Regal Commodore 4080 2007?
The Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 is the longer of the two at 46,0 feet overall. The Regal Commodore 4080 2007 comes in at 4,0 feet, making it roughly 42,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 or the Regal Commodore 4080 2007?
For trailering, the Regal Commodore 4080 2007 has the edge at 193 lbs dry weight versus 253 lbs for the Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many passengers can the Regal Commodore 4080 2007 carry?
The Regal Commodore 4080 2007 has an official capacity rating of 12 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 measures 168" wide, compared to 156" for the Regal Commodore 4080 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 or the Regal Commodore 4080 2007?
The Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 has the bigger tank at 328 gallons, versus 252 gallons on the Regal Commodore 4080 2007. That 76-gallon difference translates to roughly 228–380 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 and Regal Commodore 4080 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Regal 46 Sport Coupe 2012 and the Regal Commodore 4080 2007 are built by Regal. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.