Regal 2700 ES 2009 boat specs
Regal
Regal 2700 ES 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Regal Commodore 4460 2007 boat specs
Regal
Regal Commodore 4460 2007
2007
View full specs →

Regal 2700 ES 2009 vs Regal Commodore 4460 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Regal 2700 ES 2009 vs Regal Commodore 4460 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Regal Commodore 4460 2007 measures 44,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 15,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Regal 2700 ES 2009 at 28,5 feet (2009). At 58 lbs and 22 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Regal 2700 ES 2009 is rated for 16 passengers, while the Regal Commodore 4460 2007 caps at 13. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Regal 2700 ES 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Regal 2700 ES 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 16 passengers and at 28,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Regal Commodore 4460 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 13 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRegal
MakeRegal
Model2700 ES
ModelCommodore 446
Model Year2009
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.6 m)
Beam14 ft. (4.2 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters4.27
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches168
Bridge clearance - Detail7 ft. 6 in. (2.2 m) top up 5 ft. 9 in. (1.7 m) top down
Bridge clearance - DetailTop Down: 10 ft. 7 in. (3.2 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.29
Bridge clearance - Meters3.23
Bridge clearance - Inches9
Bridge clearance - Inches127
Deadrise24°
Deadrise20℃
Depth - Detail36 in. (0.9 m) cockpit - helm
Depth - Detail31 in. (0.8 m)
Depth - Centimeters91.44
Depth - Centimeters78.74
Depth - Inches36
Depth - Inches31
Draft [drive up] - Detail19 in. (0.4 m) high trim
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.48
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches19
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Weight - Detail5,800 lbs. (2,631 kg) with 5.7 l engine
Weight - Detail22,000 lbs. (9,979 kg)
Weight - kg2630.83
Weight - kg9979.02
Weight - lbs.58
Weight - lbs.22
Height - Detail9 ft. (2.7 m) est. height on trailer - top of w/s 6 ft. 7 in. (2 m) w/s to keel 6 ft. 8 in. (2 m) top down
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters2.74
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches108
Height - Inchesnot available
Length - Feet28.5
Length - Feet44
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 6 in. (8.7 m)
Length overall - Detail44 ft. 7 in. (13.6 m)
Length overall - Meters8.69
Length overall - Meters13.59
Length overall - Inches342
Length overall - Inches535
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (0.88 m)
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches35
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters13.6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches7
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail86 gal. (325 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail328 gal. (1,154 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters325.55
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1241.61
Fuel tank capacity - Gal86
Fuel tank capacity - Gal328
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard - Twin
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard840 Twin Volvo 8.1 GXi V FWC
Operational Info
Water capacity11 gal. (42 l) fresh
Water capacitynot available
Maximum people16
Maximum peoplenot available
Headnot available
HeadVacuFlush? w/ holding tank (2)

Regal 2700 ES 2009 vs Regal Commodore 4460 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Regal 2700 ES 2009 or the Regal Commodore 4460 2007?
The Regal Commodore 4460 2007 is the longer of the two at 44,0 feet overall. The Regal 2700 ES 2009 comes in at 28,5 feet, making it roughly 15,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Regal 2700 ES 2009 or the Regal Commodore 4460 2007?
For trailering, the Regal Commodore 4460 2007 has the edge at 22 lbs dry weight versus 58 lbs for the Regal 2700 ES 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Regal 2700 ES 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 16 passengers, while the Regal Commodore 4460 2007 is certified for 13. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Regal Commodore 4460 2007 measures 168" wide, compared to 102" for the Regal 2700 ES 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Regal 2700 ES 2009 or the Regal Commodore 4460 2007?
The Regal Commodore 4460 2007 has the bigger tank at 328 gallons, versus 86 gallons on the Regal 2700 ES 2009. That 242-gallon difference translates to roughly 726–1210 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Regal 2700 ES 2009 and Regal Commodore 4460 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Regal 2700 ES 2009 and the Regal Commodore 4460 2007 are built by Regal. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.