Matching a modified vee Regal 2665 Commodore 2008 against a deep vee Regal 3550 Cuddy 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Regal 3550 Cuddy 2013 measures 34,7 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 5,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Regal 2665 Commodore 2008 at 29,0 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Regal 2665 Commodore 2008 tips the scales at 685 lbs — 571 lbs more than the Regal 3550 Cuddy 2013 at 114 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Regal 2665 Commodore 2008 carries a rated maximum of 375 hp. Engine data for the Regal 3550 Cuddy 2013 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Regal 3550 Cuddy 2013 carries 186 gallons versus 74 gallons in the Regal 2665 Commodore 2008. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Regal 2665 Commodore 2008 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Regal 3550 Cuddy 2013 caps at 10. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Regal 2665 Commodore 2008 could be the deciding factor.