Regal 2000 RX 2009 boat specs
Regal
Regal 2000 RX 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 boat specs
Regal
Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007
2007
View full specs →

Regal 2000 RX 2009 vs Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Regal 2000 RX 2009 vs Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 measures 34,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 13,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Regal 2000 RX 2009 at 20,2 feet (2009). At 35 lbs and 114 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Regal 2000 RX 2009 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Regal 2000 RX 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Regal 2000 RX 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 20,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRegal
MakeRegal
Model2000 RX
Model3350 Sport Cruiser
Model Year2009
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.5 m)
Beam11 ft. 4 in. (3.4 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters3.45
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches136
Bridge clearance - Detail6 ft. 4 in. (1.9 m) top up 4 ft. (1.2 m) top down
Bridge clearance - DetailTop Down: 84 in. (2.1 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters1.93
Bridge clearance - Meters2.13
Bridge clearance - Inches76
Bridge clearance - Inches84
Deadrise20°
Deadrise19℃
Depth - Detail35 in. (0.8 m) cockpit - helm
Depth - Detail35 in. (0.88 m)
Depth - Centimeters88.9
Depth - Centimeters88.9
Depth - Inches35
Depth - Inches35
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (0.5 m) high trim
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches2
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Weight - Detail3,500 lbs. (1,587 kg) with 5.0 l
Weight - Detail11,400 lbs. (5,170 kg)
Weight - kg1587.57
Weight - kg5170.95
Weight - lbs.35
Weight - lbs.114
Height - Detail6 ft. 8 in. (2 m) est. height on trailer - top of w/s 5 ft. 5 in. (1.6 m) w/s to keel
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters2.03
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches8
Height - Inchesnot available
Length - Feet20.17
Length - Feet34
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 2 in. (6 m)
Length overall - Detail34 ft. 8 in. (10.6 m)
Length overall - Meters6.15
Length overall - Meters10.57
Length overall - Inches242
Length overall - Inches416
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (0.88 m)
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches35
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters10.6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches8
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal. (158 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail186 gal. (704 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters704.09
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal186
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard - Twin
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard600 Twin Mercrusier 350M MPI B3
Operational Info
Maximum people9
Maximum people1
Headnot available
HeadVacuFlush? w/ holding tank
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity4,850 lbs. (2,200 kg)

Regal 2000 RX 2009 vs Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Regal 2000 RX 2009 or the Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007?
The Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 is the longer of the two at 34,0 feet overall. The Regal 2000 RX 2009 comes in at 20,2 feet, making it roughly 13,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Regal 2000 RX 2009 or the Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007?
For trailering, the Regal 2000 RX 2009 has the edge at 35 lbs dry weight versus 114 lbs for the Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Regal 2000 RX 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 measures 136" wide, compared to 102" for the Regal 2000 RX 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Regal 2000 RX 2009 or the Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007?
The Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 has the bigger tank at 186 gallons, versus 42 gallons on the Regal 2000 RX 2009. That 144-gallon difference translates to roughly 432–720 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Regal 2000 RX 2009 and Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Regal 2000 RX 2009 and the Regal 3350 Sport Cruiser 2007 are built by Regal. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.