Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011
2011
View full specs →

Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 and the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 at 20,8 ft versus Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 at 22,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 tips the scales at 1 825 lbs — 1 631 lbs more than the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 at 194 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 200 hp for the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 and 200 hp for the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 carries 32 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 and Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
ModelZ520 Comanche
ModelZ522 Comanche
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches96.5
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches22
Weight - Detail1,825 lbs
Weight - Detail1,940 lbs
Weight - kg827.81
Weight - kg879.97
Weight - lbs.1825
Weight - lbs.194
Length - Feet20.75
Length - Feet22.33
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Meters6.81
Length overall - Inches249
Length overall - Inches268
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(2) 24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail2 - 32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Horsepower200 - 250 hp
Horsepower200 - 300 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 26 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. port, 7 ft. 6 in. center, 6 ft. 6 in. starboard
StorageLive Well: 26 gal. Rod Holders: Port: 8 ft. 6 in.; Starboard: 6 ft. 6 in.; Center Row 1: 7 ft. 6 in.; Center Row 2: 7 ft
Maximum capacity1,650 lbs
Maximum capacity1,825 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 9 in. with motor down 23 ft. 9 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all29 ft. 2 in. with motor down
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Width100 in
Trailer - Width102 in

Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011?
The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 is the longer of the two at 22,3 feet overall. The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 comes in at 20,8 feet, making it roughly 1,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011?
For trailering, the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 has the edge at 194 lbs dry weight versus 1 825 lbs for the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 and Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 share an 95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011?
The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 has the bigger tank at 32 gallons, versus 24 gallons on the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013. That 8-gallon difference translates to roughly 24–40 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 and Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2013 and the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.