Ranger Z120 2011 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z120 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010
2010
View full specs →

Ranger Z120 2011 vs Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger Z120 2011 and the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger Z120 2011 at 20,4 ft versus Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 at 20,8 ft. At 1 735 lbs and 1 825 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 has a 50-hp advantage over the Ranger Z120 2011's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 carries 52 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Ranger Z120 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 and its 250-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger Z120 2011 with its 200-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
ModelZ12
ModelZ520 Comanche?
Model Year2011
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches96.5
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches22
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail1,735 lbs
Weight - Detail1,825 lbs
Weight - kg786.98
Weight - kg827.81
Weight - lbs.1735
Weight - lbs.1825
Length - Feet20.42
Length - Feet20.75
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters6.22
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches245
Length overall - Inches249
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]23 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(2) 24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail52 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters196.84
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal52
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Horsepower200 - 225 hp
Horsepowernot available
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max250 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 26 gal. Rod Holders: Port: 8 ft.; Starboard: 7 ft
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Maximum capacity1,650 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 6 in. with motor down
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 25 ft. 9 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 23 ft. 9 in
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Width100 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs

Ranger Z120 2011 vs Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger Z120 2011 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Ranger Z120 2011 comes in at 20,4 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger Z120 2011 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
For trailering, the Ranger Z120 2011 has the edge at 1 735 lbs dry weight versus 1 825 lbs for the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger Z120 2011 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger Z120 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Ranger Z120 2011 and Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 share an 95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger Z120 2011 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 has the bigger tank at 52 gallons, versus 24 gallons on the Ranger Z120 2011. That 28-gallon difference translates to roughly 84–140 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger Z120 2011 and Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger Z120 2011 and the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.