Ranger 621VS 2007 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 621VS 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011
2011
View full specs →

Ranger 621VS 2007 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 621VS 2007 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 621VS 2007 at 21,0 ft versus Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 at 22,3 ft. At 227 lbs and 194 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Ranger 621VS 2007 has a 100-hp advantage over the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 621VS 2007 carries 55 gallons versus 32 gallons in the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 621VS 2007 and its 300-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 with its 200-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model621VS
ModelZ522 Comanche
Model Year2007
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 3/4 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches94.75
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inches22
Weight - Detail2,270 lbs. with single console
Weight - Detail1,940 lbs
Weight - kg1029.65
Weight - kg879.97
Weight - lbs.227
Weight - lbs.194
Height [transom]25 1/2 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet21
Length - Feet22.33
Length - Inches3
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters6.48
Length overall - Meters6.81
Length overall - Inches255
Length overall - Inches268
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail2 - 32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max300 hp
Engine maxnot available
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower200 - 300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,880 lbs
Maximum capacity1,825 lbs
Storagenot available
StorageLive Well: 26 gal. Rod Holders: Port: 8 ft. 6 in.; Starboard: 6 ft. 6 in.; Center Row 1: 7 ft. 6 in.; Center Row 2: 7 ft
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 8 in. with motor down 23 ft. 8 in. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all29 ft. 2 in. with motor down
Trailer - Width101 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs

Ranger 621VS 2007 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 621VS 2007 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011?
The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 is the longer of the two at 22,3 feet overall. The Ranger 621VS 2007 comes in at 21,0 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 621VS 2007 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011?
For trailering, the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 has the edge at 194 lbs dry weight versus 227 lbs for the Ranger 621VS 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 621VS 2007 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 621VS 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 measures 97" wide, compared to 95" for the Ranger 621VS 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 621VS 2007 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011?
The Ranger 621VS 2007 has the bigger tank at 55 gallons, versus 32 gallons on the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011. That 23-gallon difference translates to roughly 69–115 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 621VS 2007 and Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 621VS 2007 and the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2011 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.