Ranger 620T 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 620T 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 620T 2013 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 620T 2013 and the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 620T 2013 at 20,1 ft versus Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 at 22,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 620T 2013 tips the scales at 1 725 lbs — 1 531 lbs more than the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 at 194 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 has a 160-hp advantage over the Ranger 620T 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 32 gal and 29 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 at 22,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Ranger 620T 2013 at 20,1 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model620T
ModelZ522 Comanche
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam90 in. With Rubrail: 91.5 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches91.5
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail23.5 in
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Inches23.5
Depth - Inches22
Weight - Detail1,725 lbs
Weight - Detail1,940 lbs
Weight - kg782.45
Weight - kg879.97
Weight - lbs.1725
Weight - lbs.194
Length - Feet20.08
Length - Feet22.33
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Meters6.81
Length overall - Inches241
Length overall - Inches268
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(2) 29 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Liters109.78
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel tank capacity - Gal29
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower90 - 150 hp (150 hp with hydraulic steering only) 90 - 200 hp (200 hp with Verado 4-cycle only)
Horsepower250 - 300 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 20 gal. Baitwell: 5.5 gal. Rod Holders: 9 ft. port and starboard
StorageLive Well: 26 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. port, 7 ft. 6 in. center row 1, 7 ft. center row 2, 6 ft. 6 in. starboard
Maximum capacity1,820 lbs
Maximum capacity1,825 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. with motor down 23 ft. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all29 ft. 2 in. with motor down 27 ft. 2 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Width99 in
Trailer - Width102 in

Ranger 620T 2013 vs Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 620T 2013 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013?
The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 is the longer of the two at 22,3 feet overall. The Ranger 620T 2013 comes in at 20,1 feet, making it roughly 2,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 620T 2013 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 has the edge at 194 lbs dry weight versus 1 725 lbs for the Ranger 620T 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 620T 2013 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 620T 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 measures 97" wide, compared to 92" for the Ranger 620T 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 620T 2013 or the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013?
The Ranger 620T 2013 has the bigger tank at 32 gallons, versus 29 gallons on the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 620T 2013 and Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 620T 2013 and the Ranger Z522 Comanche 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.