Ranger 620T 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 620T 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010
2010
View full specs →

Ranger 620T 2012 vs Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 620T 2012 and the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 620T 2012 at 20,1 ft versus Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 at 20,8 ft. At 1 725 lbs and 1 825 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 has a 160-hp advantage over the Ranger 620T 2012's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 carries 52 gallons versus 37 gallons in the Ranger 620T 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 and its 250-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 620T 2012 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model620T
ModelZ520 Comanche?
Model Year2012
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam90 in. With Rubrail: 91.5 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches91.5
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail23.5 in
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches23.5
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail1,725 lbs
Weight - Detail1,825 lbs
Weight - kg782.45
Weight - kg827.81
Weight - lbs.1725
Weight - lbs.1825
Length - Feet20.08
Length - Feet20.75
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches241
Length overall - Inches249
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]23 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail37 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail52 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters140.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters196.84
Fuel tank capacity - Gal37
Fuel tank capacity - Gal52
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower90 - 150 hp (150 hp with hydraulic steering only) 90 - 200 hp (200 hp with Verado 4-cycle only)
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max250 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 20 gal. Baitwell: 5.5 gal. Rod Holders: 9 ft. port and starboard
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,820 lbs
Maximum capacity1,650 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. with motor down 23 ft. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 25 ft. 9 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 23 ft. 9 in
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width99 in
Trailer - Width100 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs

Ranger 620T 2012 vs Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 620T 2012 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 is the longer of the two at 20,8 feet overall. The Ranger 620T 2012 comes in at 20,1 feet, making it roughly 0,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 620T 2012 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
For trailering, the Ranger 620T 2012 has the edge at 1 725 lbs dry weight versus 1 825 lbs for the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 620T 2012 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 620T 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 measures 97" wide, compared to 92" for the Ranger 620T 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 620T 2012 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 has the bigger tank at 52 gallons, versus 37 gallons on the Ranger 620T 2012. That 15-gallon difference translates to roughly 45–75 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 620T 2012 and Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 620T 2012 and the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.