Ranger 619VS 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 619VS 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011
2011
View full specs →

Ranger 619VS 2013 vs Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 619VS 2013 and the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 619VS 2013 at 19,5 ft versus Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 at 19,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 619VS 2013 tips the scales at 1 975 lbs — 350 lbs more than the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 at 1 625 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 has a 25-hp advantage over the Ranger 619VS 2013's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 619VS 2013 carries 42 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 619VS 2013 with its 200-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model619VS
ModelZ519 Comanche
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in. With Rubrail: 97.5 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches97.5
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail24.5 in
Depth - Detail20 in
Weight - Detail1,975 lbs
Weight - Detail1,625 lbs
Weight - kg895.84
Weight - kg737.09
Weight - lbs.1975
Weight - lbs.1625
Length - Feet19.5
Length - Feet19.5
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Inches234
Length overall - Inches234
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Horsepower200 - 225 hp
Horsepower225 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 24 gal. Baitwell: 5.5 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. center row 1, 7 ft. 6 in. center row 2
StorageLivewell: 26 gal. Rod Holders: Port: 8 ft.; Starboard: 7 ft
Maximum capacity1,750 lbs
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 5 in. with motor down 22 ft. 5 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 7 in. with motor down
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Width101 in
Trailer - Width100 in

Ranger 619VS 2013 vs Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 619VS 2013 or the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011?
The Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 is the longer of the two at 19,5 feet overall. The Ranger 619VS 2013 comes in at 19,5 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 619VS 2013 or the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011?
For trailering, the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 has the edge at 1 625 lbs dry weight versus 1 975 lbs for the Ranger 619VS 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 619VS 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 619VS 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 619VS 2013 measures 98" wide, compared to 97" for the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 619VS 2013 or the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011?
The Ranger 619VS 2013 has the bigger tank at 42 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011. That 38-gallon difference translates to roughly 114–190 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 619VS 2013 and Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 619VS 2013 and the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2011 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.