Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation
Ranger 223 Cayman 2010 vs Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees
When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 223 Cayman 2010 and the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 223 Cayman 2010 at 22,3 ft versus Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 at 20,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 tips the scales at 1 825 lbs — 440 lbs less than the Ranger 223 Cayman 2010 at 1 385 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Ranger 223 Cayman 2010 has a 25-hp advantage over the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013's 225-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 223 Cayman 2010 carries 52 gallons versus 45 gallons in the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 223 Cayman 2010 and its 250-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 with its 225-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
Model223 Cayman
ModelZ520C Carbon Comanche
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam92.5 in. With Rubrail: 94 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches94
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail14 in
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimeters35.56
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches14
Depth - Inches21
Draft [max] - Detail10.5 in. (engine up, batteries, fuel and accessories)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.28
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches10.5
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - DetailDeck / Hull: 1,385 lbs
Weight - Detail1,825 lbs
Weight - kg628.22
Weight - kg827.81
Weight - lbs.1385
Weight - lbs.1825
Height [transom]23 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet22.25
Length - Feet20.75
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters6.78
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches267
Length overall - Inches249
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail52 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail45 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters196.84
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal52
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max250 hp
Engine maxnot available
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower225 - 250 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs
Maximum capacity1,650 lbs
Storagenot available
StorageLivewell: 31 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. center row, 8 ft. 6 in. port (7), 8 ft. 6 in. port, 6 ft. starboard
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 26 ft. 9 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 24 ft. 9 in
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 9 in. with motor down 23 ft. 9 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Width97 in
Trailer - Width101 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs