Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010
2010
View full specs →

Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 vs Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 and the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 at 22,0 ft versus Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 at 20,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 tips the scales at 1 825 lbs — 1 803 lbs less than the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 at 22 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 250 hp for the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 and 250 hp for the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 carries 52 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 and Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model2200 Bay Ranger
ModelZ520 Comanche?
Model Year2009
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam100.5 in. With Rubrail: 102 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail16.5 in
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimeters43.18
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches16.5
Depth - Inches21
Draft [max] - Detail12 in. (engine up, batteries, fuel, and accessories)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.3
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches12
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail2,200 lbs
Weight - Detail1,825 lbs
Weight - kg997.9
Weight - kg827.81
Weight - lbs.22
Weight - lbs.1825
Height [transom]25.5 in
Height [transom]23 in
Length - Feet22
Length - Feet20.75
Length overall - Detail22 ft
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Meters6.32
Length overall - Inches264
Length overall - Inches249
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail60 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail52 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters227.12
Fuel tank capacity - Liters196.84
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel tank capacity - Gal52
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max250 hp
Engine max250 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,075 lbs
Maximum capacity1,650 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 6,000 lbs
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 26 ft. Swing Arm Tongue Open: 24 ft
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 25 ft. 9 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 23 ft. 9 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Width100 in

Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 vs Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
The Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 comes in at 20,8 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
For trailering, the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 has the edge at 22 lbs dry weight versus 1 825 lbs for the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 measures 102" wide, compared to 97" for the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 or the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010?
The Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 has the bigger tank at 52 gallons, versus 6 gallons on the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009. That 46-gallon difference translates to roughly 138–230 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 and Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 2200 Bay Ranger 2009 and the Ranger Z520 Comanche 2010 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.