Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 2050 Reata 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 620VS 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 620VS 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 vs Ranger 620VS 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 and the Ranger 620VS 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 at 20,4 ft versus Ranger 620VS 2013 at 20,3 ft. At 2 175 lbs and 2 165 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Ranger 620VS 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 620VS 2013 carries 46 gallons versus 42 gallons in the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 620VS 2013 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 with its 200-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model2050 Reata
Model620VS
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96.5 in. With Rubrail: 98 in
Beam96 in. With Rubrail: 97.5 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches97.5
Depth - Detail24.5 in
Depth - Detail24.5 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inches24.5
Depth - Inches24.5
Weight - Detail2,175 lbs
Weight - Detail2,165 lbs
Weight - kg986.56
Weight - kg982.03
Weight - lbs.2175
Weight - lbs.2165
Length - Feet20.42
Length - Feet20.25
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters6.22
Length overall - Meters6.17
Length overall - Inches245
Length overall - Inches243
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail46 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters174.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal46
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower200 - 225 hp
Horsepower225 - 250 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewells: 21 gal. Baitwell: 5 gal. Rod Holders: 4 @ 7 ft. 6 in. center, 7 ft. port
StorageLivewell: 24 gal. Baitwell: 5.5 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. center row 1, 7 ft. 6 in. center row 2
Maximum capacity1,820 lbs
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 5 in. with motor down 23 ft. 5 in. with swing away tongue down
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 1 in. with motor down 23 ft. 1 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Width102 in

Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 vs Ranger 620VS 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 or the Ranger 620VS 2013?
The Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 is the longer of the two at 20,4 feet overall. The Ranger 620VS 2013 comes in at 20,3 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 or the Ranger 620VS 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger 620VS 2013 has the edge at 2 165 lbs dry weight versus 2 175 lbs for the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 620VS 2013 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 tops out at 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger 620VS 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 and Ranger 620VS 2013 share an 96.5 in. With Rubrail: 98 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 or the Ranger 620VS 2013?
The Ranger 620VS 2013 has the bigger tank at 46 gallons, versus 42 gallons on the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012. That 4-gallon difference translates to roughly 12–20 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 and Ranger 620VS 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 2050 Reata 2012 and the Ranger 620VS 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.