Ranger 186 Reata 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 186 Reata 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 186 Reata 2012 vs Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 and the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 186 Reata 2012 at 18,5 ft versus Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 at 18,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 tips the scales at 1 845 lbs — 1 690 lbs more than the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 at 155 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 140 hp for the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 and 150 hp for the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 carries 33 gallons versus 25 gallons in the Ranger 186 Reata 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Ranger 186 Reata 2012 and Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model186 Reata
ModelZ518 Comanche
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96.5 With Rubrail: 98 in
Beam92.5 in. With Rubrail: 94 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches94
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Inches24
Depth - Inches2
Weight - Detail1,845 lbs
Weight - Detail1,550 lbs
Weight - kg836.88
Weight - kg703.07
Weight - lbs.1845
Weight - lbs.155
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Feet18.67
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches224
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail25 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail33 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Liters124.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel tank capacity - Gal33
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower140 - 175 hp
Horsepower150 - 200 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 10 gal. Rod Holders: 4 @ 7 ft. center
StorageLivewell: 24 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. port, 8 ft. center
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 7 in. with motor down 21 ft. 7 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 7 in. with motor down 21 ft. 7 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 4,500 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Width99 in

Ranger 186 Reata 2012 vs Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 or the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013?
The Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The Ranger 186 Reata 2012 comes in at 18,5 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 or the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 has the edge at 155 lbs dry weight versus 1 845 lbs for the Ranger 186 Reata 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 186 Reata 2012 tops out at 140 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2012 measures 98" wide, compared to 94" for the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 or the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013?
The Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 has the bigger tank at 33 gallons, versus 25 gallons on the Ranger 186 Reata 2012. That 8-gallon difference translates to roughly 24–40 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 and Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 186 Reata 2012 and the Ranger Z518 Comanche 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.