When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 186 Reata 2011 and the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 186 Reata 2011 at 18,5 ft versus Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 at 20,8 ft. At 1 845 lbs and 1 825 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 has a 85-hp advantage over the Ranger 186 Reata 2011's 140-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 carries 45 gallons versus 27 gallons in the Ranger 186 Reata 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger 186 Reata 2011 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Ranger Z520C Carbon Comanche 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 20,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Ranger 186 Reata 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.