Ranger 186 Reata 2010 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 186 Reata 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler  2023 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023
2023
View full specs →

Ranger 186 Reata 2010 vs Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 186 Reata 2010 vs Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 186 Reata 2010 at 18,5 ft versus Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 at 16,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 tips the scales at 1 845 lbs — 295 lbs more than the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 at 1 550 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 has a 60-hp advantage over the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 27 gal and 25 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 and its 175-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 with its 115-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
Makenot available
Model186 Reata?
Modelnot available
Model Year201
Model Yearnot available
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96.5 in. With Rubrail: 98 in
Beam96.00 ft
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters29.26
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches1152
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches24
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,845 lbs
Weight - Detailnot available
Weight - kg836.88
Weight - kgnot available
Weight - lbs.1845
Weight - lbs.not available
Height [transom]26 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Feet16.8
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail16.80 ft
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters5.12
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches202
Displacementnot available
Displacement1550.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeoutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury
Engine modelnot available
Engine model115EXLPT Pro XS FourStroke
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower115 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Trailerablenot available
TrailerableYes
Boat typenot available
Boat typePower
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 4,500 lbs
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 23 ft. 7 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 21 ft. 7 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Widthnot available

Ranger 186 Reata 2010 vs Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 or the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2010 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 comes in at 16,8 feet, making it roughly 1,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 or the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023?
For trailering, the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 has the edge at 1 550 lbs dry weight versus 1 845 lbs for the Ranger 186 Reata 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2010 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 tops out at 115 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 measures 1 152" wide, compared to 98" for the Ranger 186 Reata 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 and Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 27 gallons and 25 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 and Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 186 Reata 2010 and the Ranger Boats VS1682SC Angler 2023 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.