Ranger 1850 RS 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1850 RS 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 619VS 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 619VS 2012
2012
View full specs →

Ranger 1850 RS 2013 vs Ranger 619VS 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 and the Ranger 619VS 2012 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1850 RS 2013 at 18,4 ft versus Ranger 619VS 2012 at 19,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 619VS 2012 tips the scales at 1 975 lbs — 1 797 lbs less than the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 at 178 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Ranger 619VS 2012 has a 60-hp advantage over the Ranger 1850 RS 2013's 140-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 619VS 2012 carries 42 gallons versus 34 gallons in the Ranger 1850 RS 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 619VS 2012 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 with its 140-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1850 RS
Model619VS
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96.5 in. With Rubrail: 98 in
Beam96 in. With Rubrail: 97.5 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches97.5
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Detail24.5 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,780 lbs
Weight - Detail1,975 lbs
Weight - kg807.39
Weight - kg895.84
Weight - lbs.178
Weight - lbs.1975
Length - Feet18.42
Length - Feet19.5
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.61
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Inches221
Length overall - Inches234
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower140 - 175 hp
Horsepower200 - 225 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 21 gal. Baitwell: 5 gal. Rod Holders: 7 ft. center and port
StorageLivewell: 24 gal. Baitwell: 5.5 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. center row 1, 7 ft. 6 in. center row 2
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Maximum capacity1,750 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 9 in. with motor down 21 ft. 9 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 5 in. with motor down 22 ft. 5 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 4,500 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Width101 in
Trailer - Width101 in

Ranger 1850 RS 2013 vs Ranger 619VS 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 or the Ranger 619VS 2012?
The Ranger 619VS 2012 is the longer of the two at 19,5 feet overall. The Ranger 1850 RS 2013 comes in at 18,4 feet, making it roughly 1,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 or the Ranger 619VS 2012?
For trailering, the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 has the edge at 178 lbs dry weight versus 1 975 lbs for the Ranger 619VS 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 619VS 2012 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1850 RS 2013 tops out at 140 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1850 RS 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 619VS 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 and Ranger 619VS 2012 share an 96.5 in. With Rubrail: 98 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 or the Ranger 619VS 2012?
The Ranger 619VS 2012 has the bigger tank at 42 gallons, versus 34 gallons on the Ranger 1850 RS 2013. That 8-gallon difference translates to roughly 24–40 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 and Ranger 619VS 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1850 RS 2013 and the Ranger 619VS 2012 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.