Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007
2007
View full specs →

Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 vs Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 vs Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 at 18,7 ft versus Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 at 17,0 ft. At 181 lbs and 127 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 carries 34 gallons versus 25 gallons in the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 and its 140-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 with its 115-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1850 LS Reata
ModelVS Series - 170VS
Model Year2013
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam100 in. With Rubrail: 101.5 in
Beam84 1/2 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.16
Beam - Inches101.5
Beam - Inches84.5
Depth - Detail26.5 in
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimeters68.58
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches26.5
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail1,810 lbs
Weight - Detail1,270 lbs
Weight - kg821
Weight - kg576.06
Weight - lbs.181
Weight - lbs.127
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches224
Length overall - Inches204
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]21 1/2 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail25 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower140 - 175 hp
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max115 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 19 gal. Baitwell: 6 gal. Rod Holders: 7 ft. center and port
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Maximum capacity1,000 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. with motor down 22 ft. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 8 in. with motor down 19 ft. 8 in. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 4,500 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Width94 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 2,995 lbs

Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 vs Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 or the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 or the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007?
For trailering, the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 has the edge at 127 lbs dry weight versus 181 lbs for the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 tops out at 115 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 85" for the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 or the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 has the bigger tank at 34 gallons, versus 25 gallons on the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007. That 9-gallon difference translates to roughly 27–45 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 and Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 and the Ranger VS Series - 170VS 2007 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.