Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 190 REATA 2008 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 190 REATA 2008
2008
View full specs →

Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 vs Ranger 190 REATA 2008 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 and the Ranger 190 REATA 2008 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 at 18,7 ft versus Ranger 190 REATA 2008 at 19,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 tips the scales at 181 lbs — 179 lbs more than the Ranger 190 REATA 2008 at 2 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Ranger 190 REATA 2008 has a 60-hp advantage over the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013's 140-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 34 gal and 37 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 190 REATA 2008 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 with its 140-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1850 LS Reata
Model190 Reata?
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam100 in. With Rubrail: 101.5 in
Beam90 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Inches101.5
Beam - Inches9
Depth - Detail26.5 in
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Centimeters68.58
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches26.5
Depth - Inches24
Weight - Detail1,810 lbs
Weight - Detail2,000 lbs
Weight - kg821
Weight - kg907.18
Weight - lbs.181
Weight - lbs.2
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Inches224
Length overall - Inches228
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]22 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail37 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters140.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal37
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower140 - 175 hp
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max200 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 19 gal. Baitwell: 6 gal. Rod Holders: 7 ft. center and port
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Maximum capacity1,670 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. with motor down 22 ft. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 6 in. with motor down 21 ft. 6 in. with swing-away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 4,500 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 4,500 lbs

Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 vs Ranger 190 REATA 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 or the Ranger 190 REATA 2008?
The Ranger 190 REATA 2008 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 comes in at 18,7 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 or the Ranger 190 REATA 2008?
For trailering, the Ranger 190 REATA 2008 has the edge at 2 lbs dry weight versus 181 lbs for the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 190 REATA 2008 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 tops out at 140 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 190 REATA 2008 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 9" for the Ranger 190 REATA 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 or the Ranger 190 REATA 2008?
The Ranger 190 REATA 2008 has the bigger tank at 37 gallons, versus 34 gallons on the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 and Ranger 190 REATA 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 and the Ranger 190 REATA 2008 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.