Ranger 180 Reata 2006 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 180 Reata 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 180 Reata 2006 vs Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 180 Reata 2006 vs Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 180 Reata 2006 at 18,0 ft versus Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 at 18,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 180 Reata 2006 tips the scales at 1 625 lbs — 1 444 lbs more than the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 at 181 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Ranger 180 Reata 2006's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 carries 34 gallons versus 28 gallons in the Ranger 180 Reata 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 and its 140-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 180 Reata 2006 with its 115-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model180 Reata
Model1850 LS Reata
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam92 in
Beam100 in. With Rubrail: 101.5 in
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches92
Beam - Inches101.5
Depth - Detail22 in
Depth - Detail26.5 in
Depth - Centimeters55.88
Depth - Centimeters68.58
Depth - Inches22
Depth - Inches26.5
Weight - Detail1,625 lbs
Weight - Detail1,810 lbs
Weight - kg737.09
Weight - kg821
Weight - lbs.1625
Weight - lbs.181
Height [transom]21 3/4 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters5.61
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches221
Length overall - Inches224
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(1) 28 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Engine max115-150 hp
Engine maxnot available
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower140 - 175 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,460 lbs
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Storagenot available
StorageLivewell: 19 gal. Baitwell: 6 gal. Rod Holders: 7 ft. center and port
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR (3,725 lbs.)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 7 in. with motor down 20 ft. 7 in. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. with motor down 22 ft. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Width97 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 4,500 lbs
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Ranger 180 Reata 2006 vs Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 180 Reata 2006 or the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The Ranger 180 Reata 2006 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 0,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 180 Reata 2006 or the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 has the edge at 181 lbs dry weight versus 1 625 lbs for the Ranger 180 Reata 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 180 Reata 2006 tops out at 115 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 180 Reata 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 92" for the Ranger 180 Reata 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 180 Reata 2006 or the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013?
The Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 has the bigger tank at 34 gallons, versus 28 gallons on the Ranger 180 Reata 2006. That 6-gallon difference translates to roughly 18–30 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 180 Reata 2006 and Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 180 Reata 2006 and the Ranger 1850 LS Reata 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.