Ranger 1760 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1760 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 619VS 2007 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 619VS 2007
2007
View full specs →

Ranger 1760 2012 vs Ranger 619VS 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 1760 2012 vs Ranger 619VS 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1760 2012 at 17,5 ft versus Ranger 619VS 2007 at 19,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 619VS 2007 tips the scales at 1 875 lbs — 200 lbs less than the Ranger 1760 2012 at 1 675 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Ranger 619VS 2007 has a 135-hp advantage over the Ranger 1760 2012's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 619VS 2007 carries 45 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Ranger 1760 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 619VS 2007 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1760 2012 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model176
Model619VS
Model Year2012
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches95.5
Beam - Inches96
Depth - Detail26 in
Depth - Detail24 1/4 in
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches26
Depth - Inches24.25
Weight - Detail1,675 lbs
Weight - Detail1,875 lbs
Weight - kg759.77
Weight - kg850.49
Weight - lbs.1675
Weight - lbs.1875
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches234
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]25 1/2 in
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail45 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters98.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal26
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower90 - 150 hp
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max225 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 21 gal. Baitwell: 5 gal. Rod Holders: 7 ft. 6 in. center row 1, 7 ft. center row 2
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,525 lbs
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 6 in. with motor down 20 ft. 6 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. with motor down 22 ft. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width98 in
Trailer - Width101 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs

Ranger 1760 2012 vs Ranger 619VS 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1760 2012 or the Ranger 619VS 2007?
The Ranger 619VS 2007 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Ranger 1760 2012 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1760 2012 or the Ranger 619VS 2007?
For trailering, the Ranger 1760 2012 has the edge at 1 675 lbs dry weight versus 1 875 lbs for the Ranger 619VS 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 619VS 2007 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1760 2012 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1760 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 619VS 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Ranger 1760 2012 and Ranger 619VS 2007 share an 94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1760 2012 or the Ranger 619VS 2007?
The Ranger 619VS 2007 has the bigger tank at 45 gallons, versus 26 gallons on the Ranger 1760 2012. That 19-gallon difference translates to roughly 57–95 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1760 2012 and Ranger 619VS 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1760 2012 and the Ranger 619VS 2007 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.