When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1760 2011 and the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1760 2011 at 17,5 ft versus Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 at 19,5 ft. At 1 675 lbs and 1 625 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 has a 110-hp advantage over the Ranger 1760 2011's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 1760 2011 carries 28 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1760 2011 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.