Ranger 1760 2011 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1760 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 1760 2011 vs Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1760 2011 and the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1760 2011 at 17,5 ft versus Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 at 19,5 ft. At 1 675 lbs and 1 625 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 has a 110-hp advantage over the Ranger 1760 2011's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 1760 2011 carries 28 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1760 2011 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model176
ModelZ519 Comanche
Model Year2011
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in
Beam95 in. With Rubrail: 96.5 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.46
Beam - Inches95.5
Beam - Inches96.5
Depth - Detail26 in
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Inches26
Depth - Inches2
Weight - Detail1,675 lbs
Weight - Detail1,625 lbs
Weight - kg759.77
Weight - kg737.09
Weight - lbs.1675
Weight - lbs.1625
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet19.5
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches234
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail28 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(2) 20 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Horsepower90 - 150 hp
Horsepower200 - 225 hp
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 21 gal. Rod Holders: Center Row 1: 7 ft. 6 in.; Center Row 2: 7 ft
StorageLivewell: 26 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. port, 7 ft. starboard
Maximum capacity1,525 lbs
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 6 in. with motor down
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 7 in. with motor down 22 ft. 7 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,715 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Width99 in
Trailer - Width100 in

Ranger 1760 2011 vs Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1760 2011 or the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013?
The Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 is the longer of the two at 19,5 feet overall. The Ranger 1760 2011 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1760 2011 or the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 has the edge at 1 625 lbs dry weight versus 1 675 lbs for the Ranger 1760 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1760 2011 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1760 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 measures 97" wide, compared to 96" for the Ranger 1760 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1760 2011 or the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013?
The Ranger 1760 2011 has the bigger tank at 28 gallons, versus 2 gallons on the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013. That 26-gallon difference translates to roughly 78–130 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1760 2011 and Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1760 2011 and the Ranger Z519 Comanche 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.