Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1760 Angler 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 619VS 2010 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 619VS 2010
2010
View full specs →

Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 vs Ranger 619VS 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 and the Ranger 619VS 2010 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Ranger 619VS 2010 at 19,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 619VS 2010 tips the scales at 1 975 lbs — 300 lbs less than the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 at 1 675 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Ranger 619VS 2010 has a 135-hp advantage over the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 619VS 2010 carries 45 gallons versus 25 gallons in the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 619VS 2010 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1760 Angler
Model619VS
Model Year2013
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in
Beam96 in. With Rubrail: 97.5 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches95.5
Beam - Inches97.5
Depth - Detail26 in
Depth - Detail24.25 in
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches26
Depth - Inches24.25
Weight - Detail1,675 lbs
Weight - Detail1,975 lbs. (single console)
Weight - kg759.77
Weight - kg895.84
Weight - lbs.1675
Weight - lbs.1975
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet19.5
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches234
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]25.5 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail25 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail45 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower90 - 150 hp
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max225 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 21 gal. Baitwell: 5 gal. Rod Holders: 7 ft. 6 in. center row 1, 7 ft. center row 2
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,525 lbs
Maximum capacity1,750 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 6 in. with motor down 20 ft. 6 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 24 ft. 5 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 22 ft. 5 in
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width98 in
Trailer - Width101 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs

Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 vs Ranger 619VS 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 or the Ranger 619VS 2010?
The Ranger 619VS 2010 is the longer of the two at 19,5 feet overall. The Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 or the Ranger 619VS 2010?
For trailering, the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 has the edge at 1 675 lbs dry weight versus 1 975 lbs for the Ranger 619VS 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 619VS 2010 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 619VS 2010 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 619VS 2010 measures 98" wide, compared to 96" for the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 or the Ranger 619VS 2010?
The Ranger 619VS 2010 has the bigger tank at 45 gallons, versus 25 gallons on the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013. That 20-gallon difference translates to roughly 60–100 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 and Ranger 619VS 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1760 Angler 2013 and the Ranger 619VS 2010 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.