Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1760 Angler 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 619VS 2008 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 619VS 2008
2008
View full specs →

Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 vs Ranger 619VS 2008 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and the Ranger 619VS 2008 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 at 17,0 ft versus Ranger 619VS 2008 at 19,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 619VS 2008 tips the scales at 1 975 lbs — 300 lbs less than the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 at 1 675 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Ranger 619VS 2008 has a 95-hp advantage over the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009's 130-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 619VS 2008 carries 45 gallons versus 28 gallons in the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 619VS 2008 and its 225-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 with its 130-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1760 Angler
Model619VS
Model Year2009
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in
Beam96 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches95.5
Beam - Inches96
Depth - Detail26 in
Depth - Detail24-1/4 in
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches26
Depth - Inches24.25
Weight - Detail1,675 lbs
Weight - Detail1,975 lbs. (single console)
Weight - kg759.77
Weight - kg895.84
Weight - lbs.1675
Weight - lbs.1975
Height [transom]26 in
Height [transom]25-1/2 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet19
Length - Inches6
Length - Inches6
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.94
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches234
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail28 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail45 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max130 hp
Engine max225 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,525 lbs
Maximum capacity1,750 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 5,000 lbs
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 22 ft. 6 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 20 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 5 in. with motor down 22 ft. 5 in. with swing-away tongue open
Trailer - Width99 in
Trailer - Width101 in

Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 vs Ranger 619VS 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 or the Ranger 619VS 2008?
The Ranger 619VS 2008 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 or the Ranger 619VS 2008?
For trailering, the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 has the edge at 1 675 lbs dry weight versus 1 975 lbs for the Ranger 619VS 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 619VS 2008 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 tops out at 130 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 619VS 2008 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and Ranger 619VS 2008 share an 94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 or the Ranger 619VS 2008?
The Ranger 619VS 2008 has the bigger tank at 45 gallons, versus 28 gallons on the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009. That 17-gallon difference translates to roughly 51–85 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and Ranger 619VS 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and the Ranger 619VS 2008 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.