Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1760 Angler 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 186 Reata 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 186 Reata 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 vs Ranger 186 Reata 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and the Ranger 186 Reata 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 at 17,0 ft versus Ranger 186 Reata 2013 at 18,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 186 Reata 2013 tips the scales at 1 845 lbs — 170 lbs less than the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 at 1 675 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 130 hp for the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and 140 hp for the Ranger 186 Reata 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 28 gal and 27 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and Ranger 186 Reata 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1760 Angler
Model186 Reata
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in
Beam96.5 With Rubrail: 98 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches95.5
Beam - Inches98
Depth - Detail26 in
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches26
Depth - Inches24
Weight - Detail1,675 lbs
Weight - Detail1,845 lbs
Weight - kg759.77
Weight - kg836.88
Weight - lbs.1675
Weight - lbs.1845
Height [transom]26 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches222
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail28 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max130 hp
Engine maxnot available
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower140 - 175 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,525 lbs
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Storagenot available
StorageLivewell: 10 gal. Rod Holders: 7 ft. center (4)
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 22 ft. 6 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 20 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 7 in. with motor down 21 ft. 7 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Width99 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 4,500 lbs

Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 vs Ranger 186 Reata 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 or the Ranger 186 Reata 2013?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 or the Ranger 186 Reata 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 has the edge at 1 675 lbs dry weight versus 1 845 lbs for the Ranger 186 Reata 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2013 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 tops out at 130 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 186 Reata 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 186 Reata 2013 measures 98" wide, compared to 96" for the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and Ranger 186 Reata 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 28 gallons and 27 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and Ranger 186 Reata 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1760 Angler 2009 and the Ranger 186 Reata 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.