Ranger 175VS 2006 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 175VS 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 618VS 2008 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 618VS 2008
2008
View full specs →

Ranger 175VS 2006 vs Ranger 618VS 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 175VS 2006 vs Ranger 618VS 2008 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 175VS 2006 at 17,0 ft versus Ranger 618VS 2008 at 18,0 ft. At 1 365 lbs and 1 445 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Ranger 618VS 2008 has a 60-hp advantage over the Ranger 175VS 2006's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 25 gal and 26 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Ranger 618VS 2008 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Ranger 175VS 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 618VS 2008 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 175VS 2006 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model175VS
Model618VS
Model Year2006
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam87 in
Beam83 in
Beam - Meters2.21
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches87
Beam - Inches83
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detail20-3/4 in
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches20.75
Weight - Detail1,340 lbs. with single console 1,365 lbs. with dual console
Weight - Detail1,445 lbs
Weight - kg619.15
Weight - kg655.44
Weight - lbs.1365
Weight - lbs.1445
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet18
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches216
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(1) 25 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Liters98.42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel tank capacity - Gal26
Engine max90-130 hp
Engine max150 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,145 lbs
Maximum capacity1,375 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR (2,995 lbs.)
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 7 in. with motor down 19 ft. 7 in. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 9 in. with motor down 20 ft. 9 in. with swing-away tongue open
Trailer - Width94 in
Trailer - Width94 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Ranger 175VS 2006 vs Ranger 618VS 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 175VS 2006 or the Ranger 618VS 2008?
The Ranger 618VS 2008 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Ranger 175VS 2006 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 175VS 2006 or the Ranger 618VS 2008?
For trailering, the Ranger 175VS 2006 has the edge at 1 365 lbs dry weight versus 1 445 lbs for the Ranger 618VS 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 618VS 2008 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 175VS 2006 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 175VS 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 618VS 2008 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Ranger 618VS 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 15 lbs per hp for the Ranger 175VS 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 175VS 2006 measures 87" wide, compared to 83" for the Ranger 618VS 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Ranger 175VS 2006 and Ranger 618VS 2008?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 25 gallons and 26 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Ranger 175VS 2006 and Ranger 618VS 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 175VS 2006 and the Ranger 618VS 2008 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.