Ranger 175VS 2006 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 175VS 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 175VS 2006 vs Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 175VS 2006 vs Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 measures 23,3 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 6,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Ranger 175VS 2006 at 17,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 175VS 2006 tips the scales at 1 365 lbs — 1 090 lbs more than the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 at 275 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 has a 110-hp advantage over the Ranger 175VS 2006's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Ranger 175VS 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 23,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Ranger 175VS 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model175VS
Model2310 Bay Ranger
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam87 in
Beam100 in. With Rubrail: 101.5 in
Beam - Meters2.21
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches87
Beam - Inches101.5
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detail17 in
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters43.18
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches17
Weight - Detail1,340 lbs. with single console 1,365 lbs. with dual console
Weight - Detail2,750 lbs
Weight - kg619.15
Weight - kg1247.38
Weight - lbs.1365
Weight - lbs.275
Height [transom]22 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet23.33
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters7.11
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches28
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail13.5 in
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.36
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [drive up] inches13.5
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(1) 25 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Engine max90-130 hp
Engine maxnot available
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower200 - 300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,145 lbs
Maximum capacity2,400 lbs
Storagenot available
StorageLivewell: 17 gal. Rod Holders: 9 ft. port (7), 9 ft. 6 in. starboard
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR (2,995 lbs.)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 7 in. with motor down 19 ft. 7 in. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all28 ft. 7 in. with motor down 26 ft. 7 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Width94 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height8 ft. 9 in. (add 3 ft. for T-top)
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 6,000 lbs
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Ranger 175VS 2006 vs Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 175VS 2006 or the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013?
The Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 is the longer of the two at 23,3 feet overall. The Ranger 175VS 2006 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 6,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 175VS 2006 or the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 has the edge at 275 lbs dry weight versus 1 365 lbs for the Ranger 175VS 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 175VS 2006 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 175VS 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 87" for the Ranger 175VS 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Ranger 175VS 2006 and Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 175VS 2006 and the Ranger 2310 Bay Ranger 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.