Ranger 175T 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 175T 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 191 Cayman 2006
2006
View full specs →

Ranger 175T 2013 vs Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 175T 2013 vs Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 175T 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 at 19,0 ft. At 125 lbs and 118 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 has a 125-hp advantage over the Ranger 175T 2013's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 carries 48 gallons versus 23 gallons in the Ranger 175T 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 175T 2013 with its 75-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model175T
Model191 Cayman
Model Year2013
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in. With Rubrail: 87.5 in
Beam93 in
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Inches87.5
Beam - Inches93
Depth - Detail20 in
Depth - Detail14 in
Depth - Centimeters50.8
Depth - Centimeters35.56
Depth - Inches2
Depth - Inches14
Weight - Detail1,250 lbs
Weight - DetailDeck/Hull: 1,180 lbs
Weight - kg566.99
Weight - kg535.24
Weight - lbs.125
Weight - lbs.118
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.82
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches229
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail10 1/2 in. (engine up, batteries, fuel and accessories)
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.28
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches10.5
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]22 1/2 in
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(1) 48 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters181.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel tank capacity - Gal48
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max75 hp
Engine max200 hp
Operational Info
StorageRod Holders: 7 ft. port, 9 ft. 6 in. starboard
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum capacity1,580 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 9 in. with motor down 19 ft. 9 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 5 in. with motor down 21 ft. 5 in. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 2,995 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width97 in
Trailer - Width100 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailGVWR (4,500 lbs.)
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height86 in. with poling platform

Ranger 175T 2013 vs Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 175T 2013 or the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006?
The Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Ranger 175T 2013 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 175T 2013 or the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006?
For trailering, the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 has the edge at 118 lbs dry weight versus 125 lbs for the Ranger 175T 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 175T 2013 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 175T 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 measures 93" wide, compared to 88" for the Ranger 175T 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 175T 2013 or the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006?
The Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 has the bigger tank at 48 gallons, versus 23 gallons on the Ranger 175T 2013. That 25-gallon difference translates to roughly 75–125 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 175T 2013 and Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 175T 2013 and the Ranger 191 Cayman 2006 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.