Matching a deep vee Ranger 1750 Reata 2012 against a modified vee Ranger 620T 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1750 Reata 2012 at 17,4 ft versus Ranger 620T 2013 at 20,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ranger 620T 2013 tips the scales at 1 725 lbs — 1 560 lbs less than the Ranger 1750 Reata 2012 at 165 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Ranger 1750 Reata 2012 and 90 hp for the Ranger 620T 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 620T 2013 carries 32 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Ranger 1750 Reata 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Ranger 620T 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Ranger 1750 Reata 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Ranger 620T 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Ranger 620T 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 20,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Ranger 1750 Reata 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.