Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1750 Reata 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 184 Ghost 2012
2012
View full specs →

Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 vs Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 against a modified vee Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 at 17,4 ft versus Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 at 18,3 ft. At 165 lbs and 105 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 has a 60-hp advantage over the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 carries 35 gallons versus 28 gallons in the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1750 Reata
Model184 Ghost
Model Year2011
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in
Beam85.5 in. With Rubrail: 87 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.21
Beam - Inches95.5
Beam - Inches87
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Detail13 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimeters33.02
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inches13
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs
Weight - Detail1,050 lbs
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - kg476.27
Weight - lbs.165
Weight - lbs.105
Length - Feet17.42
Length - Feet18.25
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters5.56
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches219
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail9.5 in
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.25
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [drive up] inches9.5
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail28 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Horsepower90 - 150 hp
Horsepower150 - 175 hp
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 21 gal. Rod Holders: Center: 6 ft. 6 in.; Port: 8 ft.; Starboard: 8 ft
StorageLivewells: 2 @ 15 gal. Rod Holders: 10 ft. port and starboard
Maximum capacity1,525 lbs
Maximum capacity1,275 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 6 in. with motor down
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 9 in.with motor down 21 ft. 9 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - Width98 in
Trailer - Width95.5 in
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height7 ft. 5 in. with available poling platform

Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 vs Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 or the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012?
The Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 is the longer of the two at 18,3 feet overall. The Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 comes in at 17,4 feet, making it roughly 0,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 or the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012?
For trailering, the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 has the edge at 105 lbs dry weight versus 165 lbs for the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 measures 96" wide, compared to 87" for the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 or the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012?
The Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 has the bigger tank at 35 gallons, versus 28 gallons on the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011. That 7-gallon difference translates to roughly 21–35 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 and Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1750 Reata 2011 and the Ranger 184 Ghost 2012 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.