Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1750 Reata 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 1860 2011 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1860 2011
2011
View full specs →

Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 vs Ranger 1860 2011 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 and the Ranger 1860 2011 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 at 17,0 ft versus Ranger 1860 2011 at 18,5 ft. At 165 lbs and 175 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 130 hp for the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 and 140 hp for the Ranger 1860 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 1860 2011 carries 38 gallons versus 28 gallons in the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 and Ranger 1860 2011 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1750 Reata?
Model186
Model Year2009
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. With Rubrail: 95.5 in
Beam98 in. With Rubrail: 99.5 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Inches95.5
Beam - Inches99.5
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inches25
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs
Weight - Detail1,750 lbs
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - kg793.79
Weight - lbs.165
Weight - lbs.175
Height [transom]26 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches222
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail28 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail38 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters143.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28
Fuel tank capacity - Gal38
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max130 hp
Engine maxnot available
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower140 - 175 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,575 lbs
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Storagenot available
StorageLivewell: 21 gal. Rod Holders: Cener Row 1: 8 ft.; Center Row 2: 7 ft. 6 in
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailGVWR: 3,275 lbs
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allMotor Down: 22 ft. 6 in. Swing Away Tongue Open: 20 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 7 in. with motor down
Trailer - Width98 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 4,500 lbs

Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 vs Ranger 1860 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 or the Ranger 1860 2011?
The Ranger 1860 2011 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 or the Ranger 1860 2011?
For trailering, the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 has the edge at 165 lbs dry weight versus 175 lbs for the Ranger 1860 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 1860 2011 is rated to a maximum of 140 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 tops out at 130 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 1860 2011 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 1860 2011 measures 100" wide, compared to 96" for the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 or the Ranger 1860 2011?
The Ranger 1860 2011 has the bigger tank at 38 gallons, versus 28 gallons on the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009. That 10-gallon difference translates to roughly 30–50 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 and Ranger 1860 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1750 Reata 2009 and the Ranger 1860 2011 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.