Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 1750 Reata 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Ranger Z118 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger Z118 2012
2012
View full specs →

Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 vs Ranger Z118 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 vs Ranger Z118 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 at 17,0 ft versus Ranger Z118 2012 at 18,7 ft. At 165 lbs and 155 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 130 hp for the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 and 150 hp for the Ranger Z118 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger Z118 2012 carries 33 gallons versus 28 gallons in the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger Z118 2012 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 with its 130-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model1750 Reata
ModelZ118
Model Year2006
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in
Beam92.5 in. With Rubrail: 94 in
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches94
Beam - Inches94
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs
Weight - Detail1,550 lbs
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - kg703.07
Weight - lbs.165
Weight - lbs.155
Height [transom]25 1/2 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches224
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail(1) 28 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail33 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters124.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28
Fuel tank capacity - Gal33
Engine max130 hp
Engine maxnot available
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower150 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,525 lbs
Maximum capacity1,265 lbs
Storagenot available
StorageLivewell: 24 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. center, 8 ft. port
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailSingle axle trailer GVWR (2,995 lbs.)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 7 in. with motor down 19 ft. 7 in. with motor down & swing-away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 7 in. with motor down 21 ft. 7 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Width98 in
Trailer - Width99 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 vs Ranger Z118 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 or the Ranger Z118 2012?
The Ranger Z118 2012 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 or the Ranger Z118 2012?
For trailering, the Ranger Z118 2012 has the edge at 155 lbs dry weight versus 165 lbs for the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger Z118 2012 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 tops out at 130 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger Z118 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 and Ranger Z118 2012 share an 94 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 or the Ranger Z118 2012?
The Ranger Z118 2012 has the bigger tank at 33 gallons, versus 28 gallons on the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006. That 5-gallon difference translates to roughly 15–25 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 and Ranger Z118 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 1750 Reata 2006 and the Ranger Z118 2012 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.