Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 168 Phantom 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Ranger 618T 2013 boat specs
Ranger
Ranger 618T 2013
2013
View full specs →

Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 vs Ranger 618T 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 and the Ranger 618T 2013 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 at 16,7 ft versus Ranger 618T 2013 at 18,3 ft. At 65 lbs and 16 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Ranger 618T 2013 has a 30-hp advantage over the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ranger 618T 2013 carries 31 gallons versus 17 gallons in the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Ranger 618T 2013 and its 90-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeRanger
MakeRanger
Model168 Phantom
Model618T
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam83 in. With Rubrail: 84.5 in
Beam90 in. With Rubrail: 91.5 in
Beam - Meters2.16
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Inches84.5
Beam - Inches91.5
Depth - Detail11.5 in
Depth - Detail23 in
Depth - Centimeters30.48
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Inches11.5
Depth - Inches23
Draft [drive up] - Detail6 in
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.15
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches6
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Weight - Detail650 lbs
Weight - Detail1,600 lbs
Weight - kg294.83
Weight - kg725.75
Weight - lbs.65
Weight - lbs.16
Length - Feet16.67
Length - Feet18.33
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters5.08
Length overall - Meters5.59
Length overall - Inches2
Length overall - Inches22
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail17 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail31 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters64.35
Fuel tank capacity - Liters117.35
Fuel tank capacity - Gal17
Fuel tank capacity - Gal31
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower60 - 75 hp
Horsepower90 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewells: 16 gal. Rod Holders: 10 / 9 ft. port and starboard
StorageLivewell: 20 gal. Baitwell: 12 gal. Rod Holders: 8 ft. port, 9 ft. starboard
Maximum capacity1,070 lbs
Maximum capacity1,680 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Height7 ft. 2 in. with available poling platform
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. 4 in. with motor down 18 ft. 4 in. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. with motor down 21 ft. with swing away tongue open
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 2,675 lbs
Trailer - WeightGVWR: 3,725 lbs
Trailer - Width90 in
Trailer - Width99 in

Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 vs Ranger 618T 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 or the Ranger 618T 2013?
The Ranger 618T 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,3 feet overall. The Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 comes in at 16,7 feet, making it roughly 1,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 or the Ranger 618T 2013?
For trailering, the Ranger 618T 2013 has the edge at 16 lbs dry weight versus 65 lbs for the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Ranger 618T 2013 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Ranger 618T 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Ranger 618T 2013 measures 92" wide, compared to 85" for the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 or the Ranger 618T 2013?
The Ranger 618T 2013 has the bigger tank at 31 gallons, versus 17 gallons on the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012. That 14-gallon difference translates to roughly 42–70 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 and Ranger 618T 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ranger 168 Phantom 2012 and the Ranger 618T 2013 are built by Ranger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.